HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
Gopinath – Appellant
Versus
The Inspector of Police – Respondent
CRL A(MD) 846 2022
Crl.A.(MD).No.846 of 2022
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT
DATED :21.09.2023
CORAM
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K.K.RAMAKRISHNAN
Crl.A.(MD).No.846 of 2022
Gopinath
... Petitioner
Vs.
The State rep by
The Inspector of Police,
Thanjavur Town West Police Station,
Thanjavur District.
(Crime No.110 of 2020)
... Respondent
PRAYER: Criminal Appeal filed under Section 374(2) of the Criminal
Procedure Code, to call for the entire records pertaining to the judgment
rendered by the learned Additional District Judge/Presiding Officer, Special
Court under Essential Commodities Act, Thanjavur in C.C.No.29 of 2021
vide order dated 18.11.2022 and set aside the same and consequently acquit
the appellant.
For Petitioner
: Mr.M.Karunanithi
For Respondent
: Mr.T.Senthil Kumar
Additional Public Prosecutor
Page 1 of 13
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
Crl.A.(MD).No.846 of 2022
JUDGMENT
The learned Additional District Judge/Presiding Officer, Special
Court under Essential Commodities Act, Thanjavur convicted the appellant
for the offence punishable under Section 8(c) r/w 20(b)(ii)(B) of the NDPS
Act 1985 and imposed a sentence of four years rigorous imprisonment and
imposed a fine of Rs.10,000/- in default to undergo simple imprisonment for
a period of one year, by an impugned judgment in Spl.C.C.No.29 of 2021,
dated 18.11.2022. Challenging the same, the appellant filed this appeal.
2. P.W.5 is the Inspector of police, Thanjavur west police station,
on 28.02.2020, at about 08.10 pm., received a secret information regarding
the transportation of Ganja, by the appellant in the Mela Alangam, near
Kottai Valaivu. After recording the same in the general diary and also
informed to the higher officials and obtained permission, he proceeded
towards the place of occurrence with his team along with necessary
instruments at about 8:30, p.m. The said informer identified the appellant.
After the identification, P.W.5 and his team intercepted him and when he is
attempting to escape from the scene of occurrence, they caught hold him
Page 2 of 13
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
Crl.A.(MD).No.846 of 2022
and informed about the right of conducting a search in the presence of the
learned Magistrate or the Gazetted Officer, for which, he gave consent letter
under Ex.A1 to conduct search by P.W.5 himself. Thereafter, he handed over
the white colour polythene paper to P.W.5. PW5 on opening the same,
found that there is Ganja, weighing 1.200 kgs. After ascertaining the same,
he arrested the appellant under Ex.B3. On 09.45 p.m, the Mahazar was
prepared under Ex.P2.
2.1. Then, P.W.5 brought the appellant with recovered contraband,
samples to the police station and he registered FIR in Crime No.110 of 2020
for the offence under Section 8(c) r/w 20(b)(ii)(B) of the NDPS Act 1985.
The FIR was marked as Ex.B6. Thereafter, he went to the spot and prepared
the sketch and observation Mahazar in the presence of the witnesses
Radhakrishan(P.W.3) and Parthiban(P.W.4). Ex.P7 is the observation
Mahazar and Ex.P8 is the rough sketch. Subsequently, he sent the sealed
samples along with and remaining contraband under Form 91 to the
competent Court along with the appellant/accused at the time of the remand.
He sent a detailed Special report under section 57 of the NDPS Act, which
Page 3 of 13
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
Crl.A.(MD).No.846 of 2022
was marked as Ex.P11 to the higher officers. Thereafter, he was transferred
to some other place and hence, P.W.6 conducted investigation and obtained
chemical analysis report under Ex.P10 with the positive result of the
presence of cannabis and filed a final report before the Special Court under
Essential Commodities Act, Thanjavur District, for the offence under
Section under section 8(c) r/w 20(b)(ii)(B) of the NDPS Act 1985.
3. The learned trial Judge taken the case on file in Spl.C.C.No.29
of 2021 and after furnishin