SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

MADRAS HIGH COURT
Honourable Mrs Justice S.ANANTHI
V.MUTHAIYAN – Appellant
Versus
THE REGIONAL DIRECTOR – Respondent


COMMON ORDER

(Order of the Court was made by T.S.SIVAGNANAM,J.)

Heard Mr.M.Saravanan, learned counsel appearing for the petitioners, Mr.N.Dilip Kumar learned Standing counsel appearing for the respondents 2 to 6.

2.All these writ petitions have been filed by the borrowers of housing loan from the erst-while State Bank of Trivancore, Trichirapalli Branch, for the project which was developed by the seventh respondent, Mr.Suresh Thirumalai, Proprietor, Sri Aditya Builders.

3.The petitioners have alleged fraud said to have been taken place as the then Chief Manager of the erst-while State Bank of Trivancore, (hereinafter referred to as "SBT" ) who has been impleaded in the personal capacity as eighth respondent, colluded with the seventh respondent and funds were released to the seventh respondent in full, even prior to the completion of the project. The net result was all the petitioners did not service the loan account as a result they became defaulters. Obviously, the SBT had to initiate action and thereafter, proceeded under the provisions of the Securitization and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Security Interest Act, 2002 (hereinafter referred to as “the SARFAES

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top