SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH
TARA VATI(Not Applicable) – Appellant
Versus
UCO BANK(Not Applicable) – Respondent


Advocates:
['Deepak Bhasin', '', 'Sambhav Bhasin', 'Jitender Pal Ranote', '']

O R D E R

Instant civil revision petition filed under Section 115 of the CPC, lays challenge to order dated 31.12.2021, passed by the learned Additional District Judge-1, Shimla, HP, in CMA No. 14 of 2021, reversing/setting aside order dated 13.12.2019, passed by the learned Civil Judge (Jr. Div.), Court No.4, Shimla, District Shimla, HP in CMA No. 1414 of 2019 in CS No. 131 of 2019, whereby the court below while allowing application under Order 39 Rules 1 and 2 CPC, having been filed by the plaintiff-petitioner, restrained the defendant-respondent-bank from seizing/taking the possession of the vehicle bearing registration No. HP- 63A-7036 from the plaintiff-petitioner, who is in lawful possession of the same till the case is decided on merits.

2. Precisely, the facts of the case as emerge from the record are that the plaintiff-petitioner filed suit for Permanent Perpetual Prohibitory Injunction, restraining the defendant from seizing/dispossessing/taking possession of the vehicle bearing registration No. HP-63-A-7036 from her and from anyone in lawful possession with a decree for mandatory injunction directing the defendant to close the vehicle loan account No.09810610008065 and the

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top