SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURESHWAR THAKUR
VARINDER SINGH – Appellant
Versus
RATTONO DEVI – Respondent


J U D G M E N T

The plaintiff instituted Civil Suit bearing No.

1067/95/91,before the learned Sub-Judge, 1st Class, Jawali, District Kangra, H.P. Therein they claimed that they are, alongwith performa defendant, one Lehri Ram, hence co-owners in the possession of the suit land. Since in the relevant column of the Jamabandi, for the year 1985-86, one of the defendants, one Lakshman, occurred as “gair marusi” over the suit land. The afore occurrence of one Lakshman, as “gair marusi”, upon the suit land, was in pursuance to an order made on 19.6.1985, by Naib-Tehsildar concerned. Therefore, the plaintiffs contended that the afore made reflection(s) in the relevant column of the apposite Jamabandi, of, Lakshman, as “gair marusi” upon suit khasra Nos, is, an invalid entry. Consequently, they prayed for the making a declaratory decree, for the quashing of the afore entry of Lakshman, in the revenue record, as “gair marusi” over the suit khasra Nos. The afore suit became dismissed, by the learned trial Judge, through its verdict, recorded on 11.01.2002. The dismissal of the plaintiffs’ suit, by the learned Sub-Judge concerned, was appealed by the aggrieved plaintiffs, before the learned fi

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top