SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

STATE(Not Applicable) – Appellant
Versus
NANAK CHAND(Not Applicable) – Respondent


IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA

Cr.Appeal No. 352 of 2000.

Judgement reserved on: 26.11.2007

Date of decision: 30.11.2007.

State of H.P. …….Appellant

Vs.

Nanak Chand

…. Respondent.

Coram

The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Kuldip Singh, Judge.

Whether approved for reporting?1 No

For the Appellant :

Mr. M.L. Chauhan, Addl. Advocate

General.

For the Respondent :

Mr. Rajesh Mandhotra, Advocate.

Kuldip Singh, Judge.

The State is in appeal against the judgment dated

20.1.2000 passed by learned Addl. Chief Judicial Magistrate, Dehra,

District Kangra in Criminal Case No.108-II/95, acquitting respondent

under Sections 279, 304-A IPC.

2.

The prosecution case in brief is that respondent was

driving

Van

No.HP-02-2786

on

23.4.1995

from

Ranital

to

Jawalamukhi, at place Balu Gloa, he hit Jhagri Ram at about 6 p.m.,

Jhagri Ram sustained serious injuries. He was removed to CHC

Jawalamukhi and then to Zonal Hospital, Dharamshala where he

succumbed to his injuries. On the state

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top