SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH
SANDEEP SHARMA, J
ANJALI SHARMA – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF HP AND ORS – Respondent


O R D E R

Being aggrieved and dissatisfied with order dated 5.10.2018, whereby an application under Section 408 Cr.P.C having been filed by the applicant-petitioner(hereinafter referred to as the “petitioner”) for transfer of case tilted as State of H.P. versus Anjali Sharma & others bearing FIR No.128 of 2017, dated 22.11.2017 under Sections 447, 352, 506, 34 of IPC pending adjudication before Gram Panchayat Bum, Tehsil Ghumarwin, District Bilaspur, H.P., to the Court of learned Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Ghumarwin, District Bilaspur, H.P., came to be allowed, petitioners- respondents (hereinafter referred to as the respondents) have approached this Court in the instant proceedings filed under Section 482 Cr.P.C, praying therein set-aside the aforesaid order.

2. Precisely, the ground as raised in the instant petition and has been further canvassed by learned counsel representing the petitioners- respondents is that since offences punishable under Sections 452, 354, 506 and 34 of IPC are exclusively triable by Gram Panchayat, Court below ought not have allowed the application filed by the respondent for transferring the case from Gram Panchayat Bum, Tehsil Ghumarwin, Distr

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top