SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH
KUMARI SUNITA(Not Applicable) – Appellant
Versus
JAGDISH CHAND SHARMA(Not Applicable) – Respondent


IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH,

SHIMLA

COPC No. 347 of 2012 alongwith

COPC Nos. 348, 383, 384, 385, 386, 387,

388, 389, 390, 391, 392, 393, 394, 411, 413,

414, 415, 416, 417, 420, 421, 422, 423, 424,

425, 426, 427, 428 and 346 of 2012, 119

and 127 of 2013.

Date of Decision: 28th June, 2013.

_______________________________________________________

1. COPC No. 347 of 2012.

Dal Bahadur.

.. Petitioner.

Versus

Shri N.L. Sharma.

.. Respondent.

2. COPC No. 348 of 2012.

Radha.

.. Petitioner.

Versus

Shri N.L. Sharma.

.. Respondent.

3. COPC No. 383 of 2012.

Arjun Singh and Anr.

.. Petitioners.

Versus

Shri L.N. Sharma.

.. Respondent.

4. COPC No. 384 of 2012.

Sunita and others.

.. Petitioners.

Versus

Jagdish Chand Sharma and anr.

.. Respondents.

5. COPC No. 385 of 2012.

Nurbu & others.

.. Petitioners.

Versus

Jagdish Chand Sharma and anr.

.. Respondents.

6. COPC No. 386 of 2012.

Ram Bahadur.

.. Petitioner.

Versus

- 2 -

Jagdish

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top