SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AJAY MOHAN GOEL
PRADEEP KUMAR – Appellant
Versus
DEV RAJ AND ORS – Respondent


O R D E R

By way of this review petition, the petitioner assails the judgment passed by this Court in RSA No. 114 of 2012, titled as Pardeep Kumar vs. Dev Raj and others, dated 02.11.2020, on the ground that the judgment is bad as the same was passed ignoring the factum of death of one of the parties before it, i.e. respondent No. 8 and besides this, the contention of the defendants himself as contained in written statement with regard to his right upon the suit land has not been correctly appreciated by the Court.

2. RSA No. 114 of 2012 was filed by Shri Pardeep Kumar, i.e. present petitioner feeling aggrieved by the judgment and decree passed by learned Additional District Judge-(II), Kangra at Dharamshala, District Kangra, in Civil Appeal No. 5-N/2011/16, titled as Shiv Kumar & others Versus Dev Raj & others, dated 22.11.2011. To be more elaborate, it is stated that civil suit was instituted by five plaintiffs, namely, Shri Bisheshar Lal, Amar Nath, Shiv Kumar, Ravinder Lal and Krishan Kumar against the defendants, namely, S/Shri Dev Raj and Shiam Sunder, seeking permanent injunction qua the suit land on the ground that they were owners in possession thereof, whereas the defendan

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top