SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANOOP CHITKARA
PREM NATH – Appellant
Versus
SHANTA DEVI – Respondent


O R D E R

CASE NUMBER BEFORE JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE Number 354-I/2011, Decided on 10.12.2015, by learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Lahaul-Spiti at Kullu, H.P.
SESSIONS COURT APPEALS’ NUMBER Criminal Appeal No.01 of 2016, decided on 20.5.2016, by learned Sessions Judge, Kullu, H.P.

Challenging the dismissal of the above captioned appeal, whereby learned Sessions Judge, Kullu, affirmed the order passed by learned Chief Judicial Magistrate granting the monthly maintenance as well as accommodation in the shared household, the father-in-law has come up before this Court.

2. Respondent No.1 Shanta Devi, had approached the Court of Chief Judicial Magistrate, under Section 12 of the Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005, after now called as ‘DV Act’. She has sought restrained from physical, verbal and emotional abuse and also alternative accommodation as well as financial contribution from her father-in-law. Her husband had died in an accident in 2009 and at that time she along with her husband and son were residing in the same joint ancestral property. However, they had been provided a separate room and kitchen.

3. Shanta Devi, respo

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top