HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH
LIYAKAT ALI AND ORS(Not Applicable) – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF HP AND ORS(Not Applicable) – Respondent
J U D G M E N T
By way of this petition filed under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, the petitioners have prayed for quashing of a private Criminal Complaint No. 492/2013, titled as Karim Baksh Vs. Liyakat Ali and others, under Sections 452, 451, 324, 323, 447, 427, 149, 147, 148, 506 & 34 of the Indian Penal Code, which is pending before the Court of learned Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Court No. 1, Amb, District Una, H.P.
2. I have heard learned counsel for the petitioners as well as learned counsel for respondents No. 2 to 4 and learned Additional Advocate General.
3. Respondents No. 2 to 4, who are present in person in the Court, have been duly identified by their counsel Mr. Lakshay Parihar, Advocate. Their statements have also been separately recorded in the Court, wherein they have stated that they have entered into a compromise with the accused and they are not interested in pursuing the matter which led to the filing of a private Criminal Complaint No. 492/2013, titled as Karim Baksh Vs. Liyakat Ali and others, under Sections 452, 451, 324, 323, 447, 427, 149, 147, 148, 506 & 34 of the Indian Penal Code, which is pending before the Court of learned Addi
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.