SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH
VIVEK SINGH THAKUR, J
HEM KUMAR SHARMA – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF H.P. – Respondent


Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: SH. ANIRUDH SHARMA
For the Respondents: SH. HEMANT VAID

ORDER

Petitioner has approached this Court, invoking provisions of Section 438 Cr.P.C., seeking anticipatory bail in case FIR No. 98 of 2022, dated 10.6.2022, registered in Police Station Dharampur, District Solan, H.P. under Sections 354 -A , 354, 376(3), 376(2)F of the Indian Penal Code (for short ‘IPC’) and Section s 6 and 10 of Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act , 2012 (for short ‘POCSO Act’).

2. Status Report stands filed. Record was also made available.

3. Petitioner has also placed a certificate on record, whereby he has been given State Level Teachers Award-2020 for doing extra-ordinary work for characteristic, physical and cultural development of students. A Pen Drive has also been placed on record, allegedly having conversation of someone on behalf of complainant with relative of the petitioner making offer for amicable settlement.

4. Prosecution case is that on 10.6.2022 an e-mail bearing rapat No. 15 in Daily Diary dated 10.6.2022 was received in the Police Station, Dharampur from Police Chowki Subathu, informing that one Devinder Kumar had submitted a complaint about teasing the school girls by DPE, posted in Government Girls School, Subathu, during training

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top