SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH
BHARTI AXA GENERAL INSURANCE COMPANY LTD(Not Applicable) – Appellant
Versus
NITYA(Not Applicable) – Respondent


Advocates:
['Sanjay Kumar Sharma', '', 'Kamini', 'Sanjay Gandhi', 'NEMO']

J U D G M E N T

The instant appeal, under Section 173 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988, has been maintained by the appellant/Insurance Company (hereinafter Whether reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgment ?

referred to as the 8Insurance Company9) against the respondents/claimants/petitioner (hereinafter referred to as 8petitioners9) for quashing and setting aside impugned award, dated 10.08.2018, passed in MAC Petition No. 10-T/2 of 2014 by learned Motor Accident Claims Tribunal- CBI, H.P. (Camp at Theog), whereby petition filed under Section 166 of the Motor Vehicle Act, has been allowed and the appellant has been held liable for the compensation.

2. As per the appellant, the impugned award passed by the learned Court below is against the facts, which have come on record, without application of mind and without considering the question of maintainability of the appeal, as the driver was not negligent in driving the vehicle.

3. Brief facts giving rise to the present appeal are that on 12.05.2013, the petitioner was traveling in the vehicle, bearing registration No. HP13-2140 (Santro Car), and Smt. Sunita boarded the same from Kandaghat to Rohru. It has been averred t

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top