SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANOOP CHITKARA
SHEELA DEVI – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF HP AND OTHERS – Respondent


O R D E R

CASE NUMBER Case number 145-IV/09, Decided on BEFORE JUDICIAL 12.07.2019, by learned Judicial Magistrate MAGISTRATE FIRST Class, Palampur, District Kangra, H.P.

Aggrieved by the dismissal of application under Section 156 (3) Cr.P.C., by learned Judicial Magistrate First Class (JMFC), Palampur, District Kangra, the complainant has come up before this Court.

2. The complainant/petitioner had filed an application under Section 156 (3) Cr.P.C., which was registered as Case No.145-IV/2019. Vide order dated 12.07.2019, learned Judicial Magistrate First Class, dismissed the application on the ground that although copy of the application addressed to Station House Officer is annexed, but there was no endorsement to prove that it was in fact received by him. Further the complainant did not produce anything to prove that he had approached higher authorities i.e. Superintendent of Police, on the refusal of Station House Officer to take action. Thus, learned Magistrate observed that the powers under Section 156(3) Cr.PC can be invoked only when the complainant exhausted the remedy under Section 154 Cr.P.C.

3. I have gone through the application and the orders passed by learned Magistrate

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top