HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH
HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE SABINA,HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUSHIL KUKREJA
POOJA DEVI – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF HP AND ORS – Respondent
O R D E R
Petitioner has filed the petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, seeking following relief(s):-
“i) To quash and set aside the clarification (Annexure P- 5) provided in the policy for engagement for Part Time Multi Task Workers in Govt. schools in H.P. specifically ion Serial No.1 Clause 7 (iv)(i) in which the meaning of the term ‘Family’ has been given as ‘Land Donor’ or his/her spouse and their children as being unconstitutional and arbitrary and against the meaning as provided in law.
ii) That the result contained in Annexure P-6 whereby the respondent No.5 has been selected for the Part Time Multi Task Worker may kindly be quashed and set aside and further the respondents may kindly be directed to grant 8 marks qua land donation and being a member of low income family and elder in age, petitioner may kindly be offered appointment to the post of Part Time Multi Task Worker in Govt. Primary School Bhuddi, Education Block Paonta Sahib, District Sirmaur, H.P.
iii) To award marks in favour of petitioner under the category “for candidates whose families have donated land for school” 8 marks in view of the equality principle enshrined in Article 14 and 16 of the
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.