SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH
HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE SABINA,HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUSHIL KUKREJA
POOJA DEVI – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF HP AND ORS – Respondent


O R D E R

Petitioner has filed the petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, seeking following relief(s):-

“i) To quash and set aside the clarification (Annexure P- 5) provided in the policy for engagement for Part Time Multi Task Workers in Govt. schools in H.P. specifically ion Serial No.1 Clause 7 (iv)(i) in which the meaning of the term ‘Family’ has been given as ‘Land Donor’ or his/her spouse and their children as being unconstitutional and arbitrary and against the meaning as provided in law.

ii) That the result contained in Annexure P-6 whereby the respondent No.5 has been selected for the Part Time Multi Task Worker may kindly be quashed and set aside and further the respondents may kindly be directed to grant 8 marks qua land donation and being a member of low income family and elder in age, petitioner may kindly be offered appointment to the post of Part Time Multi Task Worker in Govt. Primary School Bhuddi, Education Block Paonta Sahib, District Sirmaur, H.P.

iii) To award marks in favour of petitioner under the category “for candidates whose families have donated land for school” 8 marks in view of the equality principle enshrined in Article 14 and 16 of the

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top