Back
HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH
MR. JUSTICE MOHAMMAD RAFIQ, CJ, MS. JUSTICE SABINA, J
DR. CHANDER SHEKHAR – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF HIMACHAL PRADESH THROUGH PRINCIPAL SECRETARY (HEALTH) – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. regulation of admissions to postgraduate medical courses. (Para 2 , 3) |
| 2. requirement of bonds serves governmental health objectives. (Para 4 , 20) |
| 3. new policy supersedes old regulations. (Para 5 , 6) |
| 4. supreme court confirms validity of mandatory bonds. (Para 15 , 16 , 18) |
| 5. court's overview of binding nature of the bond. (Para 28 , 29) |
JUDGMENT
1) Vide this judgement, above mentioned Letters Patent Appeals as well as writ petitions, would be disposed of as the issue involved in all these cases is the same.
2) The issue involved in all these cases relates to compulsory bonds to be executed for admission to Post Graduate Medical Courses and Super Specialty Courses. Writ petitions were filed by the petitioners challenging the mandatory provisions of service provided under Clauses 6.1 and 11.1.2 of the Post Graduation/Super Specialty Policy for Regulating Admission to various Post Graduation and Super Specialty Courses in Medical Education 2019, applicable in the State of Himachal Pradesh (hereinafter referred to as PG/Super Specialty Policy).
3) The undisputed facts, relevant for adjudication of the case, are that seven Government Medical Colleges and one private medi
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
