SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH
SANDEEP SHARMA, J
M/S JAGSON INTERNATIONAL LTD. – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF HP AND ANR – Respondent


O R D E R

By way of instant petition filed under Section 9 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, interim direction has been sought against the respondents, restraining them from taking any coercive action against the petitioner pursuant to notice dated 5.9.2020 (Annexure P-3) including cancellation of Concession Agreement or any further action pursuant thereto.

2. Though reply to the petition stands filed on behalf of the respondents, but on 27.4.2021, learned counsel for the petitioner informed this court that since notice, praying therein for appointment of Arbitrator already stands served upon the respondents, necessary direction may be issued to the respondents-defendants to do the needful expeditiously.

3. Mr. Desh Raj Thakur, learned Additional Advocate General while placing on record communication dated 9/11.8.2021 addressed to the Director, Tourism & Civil Aviation, Himachal Pradesh, Shimla-09, contends that respondents have already accepted the prayer made on behalf of the petitioner for appointment of Arbitrator and Mr. Ajay Kumar Garg, Retired Chief Engineer from HPPWD, Ashiana Elysium Hill near Radison Hotel Goodwood Shimla, H.P. has been appointed as Arbitrator i

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top