SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND - PRINCIPAL BENCH JHARKHAND
MAHESHWAR TIGGA – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF JHARKHAND – Respondent


Advocates:
['NEHALA SHARMIN', '', 'RAJNEESH VARDHAN', 'LAXMI MURMU APP']

1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI

Cr. Appeal (S.J.) No. 300 of 2004

....

(Against the judgment of conviction dated 12.02.2004 and order of

sentence, dated 13.02.2004, passed by learned Additional Judicial

Commissioner, Fast Track Court No. IV, Ranchi, in Sessions Trial No. 15 of

2000).

Maheshwar Tigga, son of Shri Bhandhana Tigga, resident of Bansyhari, P.S.

Mandar, District- Ranchi.

.. Appellant

Versus

The State of Jharkhand

. Respondent

------

PRESENT

CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE KAILASH PRASAD DEO

For the Appellant

: Mrs. Priya Shrestha, Advocate

Mr. Faisal Allam, Advocate

Ms. Nehala Sharmin, Advocate

For the State

: Mrs. Laxmi Murmu, Additional Public Prosecutor

------

By Court:-

The instant Criminal Appeal has been preferred against the judgment

of conviction dated 12.02.2004 and order of sentence, dated 13.02.2004, passed

by learned Additional Judicial Commissioner, Fast Track Court No. IV, Ranchi,

in Sessions Trial No. 15 of 2000, whereby the sole appellant Maheshwar Tigga

has been found guilty for the offence committed and punishable under Sections

376, 323 and 341 of the Indian Penal Code and awarded rigorous imprisonment

for seven ye

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top