SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND - PRINCIPAL BENCH JHARKHAND
MD.MISTER – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF JHARKHAND – Respondent


Advocates:
['N K RAM', '', 'KUNDAN KUMAR SINGH', 'A K SINHA', 'NILESH KUMAR', 'SUNIL PANDEY', 'MD ANISURZZAMA KHAN', 'A P P', '', 'RUBY PANDEY', 'KUMARI RASHMI']

1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI

Cr. Revision No. 871 of 2003

Md. Mister

….. Petitioner

Versus

State of Jharkhand

….. Opposite Party

With

Cr. Revision No. 863 of 2003

1. Md. Khalid Anwar @ Bablu

2. Md. Parbez Alam

….. Petitioners

Versus

The State of Jharkhand

….. Opposite Party

---------

CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE DEEPAK ROSHAN

---------

For the Petitioners : Md. Anisurzzama Khan, Advocate

For the State

: Ms. Kumari Rashmi, APP

--------

07/ 10.06.2022

Heard learned counsel for the parties.

2.

Both applications arise out of common judgment and are

interconnected, as such same are heard together and dispose of by

this common order.

3.

Both applications are directed against the judgment

dated 27.06.2003, passed by 4th Additional Judicial Commissioner-

cum-Spl. Judge-II CBI, AHD, Ranchi in criminal appeal No. 29 of

2002 and 30 of 2002, whereby the appeal preferred by the

petitioners has been dismissed and the judgment of conviction and

order of sentence dated 12.03.2002, passed in G.R. No.731 of 1999

correspon

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top