Advocates:
['NITU SINHA', '', 'ARUN KUMAR SINHA', 'S K PANDEY APP']

Cr. Appeal (SJ) No. 16 of 2007

Against the judgment of conviction and order of sentence dated 13.12.2006

passed by learned Session Judge, Pakur in Session Case No. 39 of 2006.

……….

Pradip Kumar Saha

…....

…..

...Appellant

Versus

The State of Jharkhand

…

…

. ….. .. ..Respondent.

------

P R E S E N T

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANANDA SEN.

-----

For the Appellant : Mrs. Nitu Sinha, Advocate.

For the State: Mr. Sanjay Kumar Pandey, Addl. P.P.

------

Ananda Sen, J:

The appellant has challenged the judgment of conviction and

order of sentence dated 13.12.2006 passed by learned Session Judge, Pakur in

Session Case No. 39 of 2006, by which, he having been found guilty of offence

under Sections 323, 342, 354 and 504 of the Indian Penal Code, has been

convicted and sentenced to undergo S.I. for one year each under Section 354 and

504 of the Indian Penal Code and S.I. for six months each under Sections 323

and 342 of the Indian Penal Code and it was directed that all the sentences shall

run concurrently.

2.

The prosecution case is based on the fardbeyan of Putul Devi

(P.W.8) in which, she stated that on 29.10.2005 she-goats of the appel