SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND - PRINCIPAL BENCH JHARKHAND
Balbhadra Ghasi Az Bhailbadar Nayak – Appellant
Versus
Baha Nayak – Respondent


IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI

Second Appeal No.120 of 2010

Siba Ghasi & Ors.

……

Appellants

Versus

Manrakhan Ghasi & Ors.

……

Respondents

-----

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANANT BIJAY SINGH

-----

For the Appellant

: Mr. Ayush Aditya, Advocate

For the Respondent

: A.P.P

-----

07/Dated: 29/11/2017

Heard learned counsel for the parties.

This appeal will be heard on the following substantial questions of law.

(i)

Whether since the learned lower appellate court has recorded a

categorical finding (refer para-12 at page 16) that the learned trail

court did not analyse the evidence, the learned lower appellate court

has committed an error on a substantial question of law by not

remanding the matter back to the learned trail court for giving finding

on the issues framed upon consideration of oral and documentary

evidence led by the parties?

(ii)

Whether at any rate after having held at para-12, page-16 of

the judgment that the learned trail court had no analysed the

evidence led by the parties, the learned lower appellate court has

itself committed an error on a substantial question of law by merely

referring to one or two sentences of t

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top