SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND - PRINCIPAL BENCH JHARKHAND
PAWAN KUMAR And ORS – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF JHARKHAND And ORS – Respondent


Advocates:
['ARUN KUMAR', 'G P I', '', 'MANISH MISHRA', 'SHASHANK SHEKHAR PD']

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI

[Civil Writ Jurisdiction]

W.P.(C) No. 2643 of 2009

Nakul Singh & Another

.... .. ... Petitioners

Versus

The State of Jharkhand & Ors.

.. ... ... Respondents

WITH

W.P.(C) No. 5461 of 2009

Pawan Kumar & Others

.... .. ... Petitioners

Versus

The State of Jharkhand & Ors.

.. ... ... Respondents

...........

CORAM

:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE KAILASH PRASAD DEO

.........

For the Petitioners

: Mr. Arun Kumar, Advocate

[In both cases]

For the respondents-State

: Mr. Manish Mishra, G.P.-V [in W.P.(C) no.5461/2009]

For the respondent nos.3-5

: Mr. Shashank Shekhar Prasad, Advocate

[In both cases]

…...

09/ 28.06.2022.

Both writ petitions are arising out of common issues, as such, both are being

heard together and disposed of by this common order/judgment.

Both writ petitions have been preferred by the petitioners, namely, Nakul

Singh, Manoj Kumar Agarwal as well as petitioners, namely, Pawan Kumar, Md.

Asgar, Md. Jaffar Ali and Ram Lal Nayak stating that they are running their shops

on the basis of lease granted by respondent no.3 (Executive Officer, Gumla Nagar

Panchayat, Gumla) and that is the only source of the livelihood. O

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top