SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

MAHESH PANDEY ALIAS MAHESH PRASAD PANDEY AND ANR – Appellant
Versus
The State Of Jharkhand – Respondent


Advocates:
['VISHAL KUMAR TRIVEDI', '', 'SHRESTH GAUTAM', 'GOURI S PRASAD']

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND, RANCHI

A. B. A. No. 4984 of 2013

1. Mahesh Pandey @ Mahesh Prasad Pandey

2. Manish Pandey @ Manish Kr. Pandey...

...

...

Petitioners

Versus

The State of Jharkhand ... ...

...

..

..

Opp. Party

CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE PRASHANT KUMAR

............

For the Petitioners

: M/s Rajeev Ranjan, Vishal Kumar Trivedi

For the State

: Mr. Pankaj Kumar, A.P.P.

........

2/21.03.2014

Anticipatory bail application filed by Mahesh Pandey @

Mahesh Prasad Pandey and Manish Pandey @ Manish Kr. Pandey is

moved by Sri Rajeev Ranjan, learned counsel for the petitioner and

opposed by Sri Pankaj Kumar, learned Additional PP for the State.

It is alleged that petitioners who are father and son had

entered in the house of complainant and then petitioner Manish

Pandey @ Manish Kr. Pandey snatched Rs. 1500/- from the pocket of

complainant, whereas, petitioner Mahesh Pandey @ Mahesh Prasad

Pandey snatched golden chain from the neck of complainant's aunt. It

is relevant to mention that complainant's grand father had sold some

land in favour of petitioners for which a civil suit is pending. Thus, it

appears that there i

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top