SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

BASIL EKKA And ANR – Appellant
Versus
PROJECT And DEVELOPMENT INDIA LT – Respondent


Advocates:
['SANJAY PIPRAWALL', '', 'SATISH KUMAR MISHRA', 'AMITABH']

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI

W. P. (S) No. 3156 of 2005

Basil Ekka & Another

...

Petitioners

-V e r s u s-

Projects & Development India Ltd. & Ors.…

...

Respondents

CORAM: - HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE APARESH KUMAR SINGH

For the Petitioners

: - Mr. Sanjay Piperwall, Advocate

For the Respondents

: - Mr. Amitabh, Advocate

...

09/18.02.2013

Heard learned counsel for he parties.

The petitioners had acquired higher qualification

pursuant to that they were granted two increments on

account of acquiring such higher qualification as per the

incentive scheme vide circular contained at Annexure-1 to the

writ petition.

However, when the respondents floated the VRS

Scheme and the petitioners accepted their VRS package, the

same was calculated by not reckoning two advance

increments earlier granted to these petitioners. This is the

summary of the case of the petitioners. Petitioners have made

representation vide Annexure-7 series and also sent legal

notices through their lawyers.

Learned counsel for the respondents, on the other hand,

submits that there has been complete cessation of the jural

relationship between th

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top