SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND - PRINCIPAL BENCH JHARKHAND
SATYA NARAYAN SHARMA – Appellant
Versus
PUNIT KUMAR RAY And ANR – Respondent


1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI

F.A. No. 102 of 2011

Satya Narayan Sharma

... Appellant

-V e r s u s -

1.

Punit Kumar Ray

2.

Smt. Arvinder Kaur

... ... ... Respondents

CORAM: - HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE D. N. UPADHYAY

For the Appellant

: Mr. Amar Kumar Sinha, Advocate.

Mr. Sandeep Verma, Advocate.

For the Respondents: Mr. Manjul Prasad, Sr. Advocate.

Mr. Jitesh Kumar, Advocate.

C.A.V. ON 09/09/2015

PRONOUNCED ON 16 /09/2015

D.N. Upadhyay, J.

This Appeal has been preferred by the plaintiff against the Judgment

dated 11.05.2011, decree dated 21.05.2011, passed and signed by learned Sub-

Judge-VII, Jamshedpur in connection with Title Suit No. 84 of 2006 whereby the

suit as against the defendant no. 1 decreed ex-parte and against defendant no. 2

on contest.

2.

The case of the plaintiff in brief is that he entered into an agreement

on 09.07.2004 to purchase a piece of land, area measuring 14 ft. x 56 ft., together

with kutcha house consisting thereon under Plot No. 317 (A) and (B) recorded

under Khata No. 413, Survey Ward No. 4, Mouza – Jugsalai, .S. - Jugsalai, District

– Singhbhum East more described in Schedule-A for a valuable consideration of

Rs.3

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top