SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

Rabi Bhushan – Appellant
Versus
The State Of Jharkhand And Ors – Respondent


Advocates:
['RAM NARAYAN UPADHYAY', '', 'TEJO MISTRY', 'ATANU BANERJEE', '', 'SHANKAR LAL AGARWAL']

[1]

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI

W.P.(C) No.464 of 2017

Rabi Bhushan

. … Petitioner

Versus

1. The State of Jharkhand.

2. The Sub-Divisional Magistrate-cum-House Rent controller, Dhalbhu,

Singhbhum East.

3. Smt. Prabhawati Devi.

… Respondents

-------

CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SUJIT NARAYAN PRASAD

-------

For the Petitioner

: Mr. Tejo Mistry, Advocate

Mr. Ram Narayan Upadhyay, Advocate

For the Resp.-State

: Mr. Atanu Banerjee, Sr. SC-III

Mr. D.C. Mishra, AC to Sr. SC-III

For the Resp. No.3

: Mr. Shankar Lal Agarwal, Advocate

----------------------------

06/Dated 16th October, 2019

1.

This writ petition is under Article 226 of the Constitution of India

whereby and whereunder orders dated 19.10.2016 and 07.11.2016

passed in HRC Case No.28 of 2013 by the Sub-Divisional

Magistrate-cum-House Rent Controller, Dhalbhum, Jamshedpur has

been sought to be quashed.

2.

It is the case of the petitioner that a proceeding has been initiated by

making an application by the respondent-landlord for fair fixation

of rent as required to be fixed under the Jharkhand Building (Lease,

Re

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top