SIKANDAR KUMAR MEHTA – Appellant
Versus
THE STATE OF JHARKHAND – Respondent
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI
Cr. Revision No. 45 of 2021
….
Sikandar Kumar Mehta
…… Petitioner
Versus
1. The State of Jharkhand
2. Pradeep Kumar Sao
…… Opp. Parties
-----
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY PRASAD
-----
For the petitioner
: Md. Mohammad Asghar, Advocate
For the State
: Mr. Shailesh Kumar Sinha, A. P. P.
For the O. P. No. 2: Mr. Raj Vardhan, Advocate
…..
I.A. No. 8034 of 2022
08/05.09.2022
Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel
for the State.
2.
The instant I.A. No. 8034 of 2022 has been filed under
Section 5 of the Limitation Act for condoning the delay of 658 days in
filing the instant Criminal Revision No. 45 of 2021.
3.
It has been submitted that the learned counsel for the
appellant that there is delay of 658 days in filing Criminal Revision
No. 45 of 2021. It is submitted that the case has been compromised
between the petitioner and the opposite party no. 2 and the petitioner
has also paid the amount in question and as such, delay of 658 days in
pref
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.