SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

SIKANDAR KUMAR MEHTA – Appellant
Versus
THE STATE OF JHARKHAND – Respondent


Advocates:
['MOHAMMAD ASGHAR', 'SHAILESH KR SINHA', '', 'RAJ VARDHAN']

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI

Cr. Revision No. 45 of 2021

….

Sikandar Kumar Mehta

…… Petitioner

Versus

1. The State of Jharkhand

2. Pradeep Kumar Sao

…… Opp. Parties

-----

CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY PRASAD

-----

For the petitioner

: Md. Mohammad Asghar, Advocate

For the State

: Mr. Shailesh Kumar Sinha, A. P. P.

For the O. P. No. 2: Mr. Raj Vardhan, Advocate

…..

I.A. No. 8034 of 2022

08/05.09.2022

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel

for the State.

2.

The instant I.A. No. 8034 of 2022 has been filed under

Section 5 of the Limitation Act for condoning the delay of 658 days in

filing the instant Criminal Revision No. 45 of 2021.

3.

It has been submitted that the learned counsel for the

appellant that there is delay of 658 days in filing Criminal Revision

No. 45 of 2021. It is submitted that the case has been compromised

between the petitioner and the opposite party no. 2 and the petitioner

has also paid the amount in question and as such, delay of 658 days in

pref

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top