SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

SIYAVAR MAHTO – Appellant
Versus
THE STATE OF JHARKHAND – Respondent


Advocates:
['KRIPA SHANKAR NANDA', 'SHIV SHANKAR KUMAR', '', 'AWANISH SHEKHAR']

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI

A.B. A. No. 979 of 2020

Siyavar Mahto

Petitioner

Versus

The State of Jharkhand

Opposite Party

Coram: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY

For the Petitioner

: Mr. K.S. Nanda, Adv.

For the State

: Mr. S. Shankar Kumar, Addl. P.P.

For the Informant

: Mr. Awanish Shekhar, Adv.

02 / 24.02.2020

Heard the parties.

Apprehending his arrest, the petitioner has moved this

Court for grant of privilege of anticipatory bail in connection with

Kurkura P.S. case no. 05 of 2019 registered under Sections

379/511/120B of the Indian Penal Code, section 15(2)/15(4)/16 of

PMP Act.

Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that

the allegations against the petitioner is that he has damaged the

pipe line of IOCL by creating hole as laid under section 7 of the

Petroleum Mineral Pipelines (Acquisition Of Right of User In Land)

Act, 1962. It is then submitted that the allegations against the

petitioner are all false and the petitioner has been implicated in this

case only

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top