HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND - PRINCIPAL BENCH JHARKHAND
MS TENUGHAT VIDYUT NIGAM LIMITED THROUGH ITS PERSONNEL OFFICER PALLAB PRASANT – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF JHARKHAND THROUGH ITS SECRETARY DEPTT LABOUR EMPLOYMENT AND TRAINING – Respondent
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI
[Civil Writ Jurisdiction]
W.P.(L) No. 641 of 2022
M/s Tenughat Vidyut Nigam Limited (TVNL)
.... .. ... Petitioner
Versus
State of Jharkhand & Ors.
.. ... ... Respondents
...........
CORAM
:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE KAILASH PRASAD DEO
For the Petitioner
: Mr. R.S. Mazumdar, Sr. Advocate
Mrs. Jasvindar Mazumdar, Advocate
Mr. Rohan Mazumdar, Advocate
For the respondent-State
: Mr. Deepankar, AC to A.G.
For the respondent nos.2-5
: Mr. Anjani Kumar Pandey, in-person
…...
03/ 20.07.2022.
Heard, learned counsel for the parties.
Mr. R.S. Mazumdar, learned Sr. counsel assisted by Mrs. Jasvindar
Mazumdar, learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted, that in the 4th line
order dated 08.06.2022 it has wrongly been typed as “restored without giving
opportunity to the petitioner” which is apparent error of record, as the show-
cause of the petitioner has already been brought on record as Annexure-3 to
the writ petition and the same has also been considered in the impugned order,
as such, that part of the order with regard to “restored without giving
opportunity to the petitioner” may be deleted.
Accordingly the words “
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.