SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

Kati Kisku Alias Lakhi Ram Kisku And Anr – Appellant
Versus
The State Of Jharkhand – Respondent


Advocates:
['P K MUKHOPADHYAY', '', 'ARWIND KUMAR', 'ASHISH KUMAR', 'APP']

- 1 -

Cr. Appeal (DB) No.537 of 2016

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI

Cr. Appeal (DB) No.537 of 2016

(Against the Judgment of conviction dated 27th April, 2016 and Order of sentence

dated 02nd May, 2016, passed by the Additional Sessions Judge-VIII, Dhanbad, in

S.T. No. 74 of 2009.)

1.Kati Kisku @ Lakhi Ram Kisku

2.Rajesh Murmu

….

Appellants

Versus

The State of Jharkhand

…..

Respondent

P R E S E N T

HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE H.C. MISHRA

HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE B.B. MANGALMURTI

…..

For the Appellants

: Mr. K.N. Roy, Advocate

Mr. Parijat Sinha, Advocate

For the State

: Mr. Ram Prakash Singh, APP

…..

By Court.:-

Heard learned counsel for the appellants and learned counsel

for the State.

2.

The appellants are aggrieved by the Judgment of conviction

dated 27th April, 2016 and Order of sentence dated 02nd May, 2016, passed

by the learned Additional Sessions Judge-VIII, Dhanbad, in S.T. No. 74

of 2009, whereby, both the appellants have been found guilty and convicted

for the offence under Section 302 of the Indian

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top