SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

VIJAY KUMAR SHARMA – Appellant
Versus
BODHRAJ SHARMA – Respondent


Advocates:
['ASHUTOSH ANAND', 'NAMITA SAHAY', '', 'TAPESHWAR NATH MISHRA', 'AMARESH KUMAR']

1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI

C.M.P. No. 132 of 2020

Vijay Kumar Sharma

Petitioner

Versus

Bodhraj Sharma

Respondent

CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH SHANKAR

-----

For the Petitioner

: Mr. Ashutosh Anand, Advocate

For the Respondent

: Mr. Amresh Kumar, Advocate

-----

03/08.01.2021

The present C.M.P. is taken up today through Video

conferencing.

The present civil miscellaneous petition has been preferred

for quashing and setting aside the order dated 14.03.2019 passed by the

Civil Judge (Senior Division)-II-cum-L.A. Judge, Ranchi in Execution Case

No. 17 of 2011, whereby the application of the decree holder/respondent

for delivery of possession of the property was allowed. Further prayer

has been made for quashing the order dated 06.01.2020 passed by the

learned Munsif, Ranchi in Execution Case No. 165 of 2019 (renumbered

after Execution Case No. 17 of 2011 upon transfer), whereby the petition

filed by the petitioner for recall of the order dated 14.03.2019 has been

rejected.

2.

The factual background of the case as stated in the civil

miscellaneous petition is that the respondent

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top