SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

GEETA DEVI ALIAS GETA DAVI – Appellant
Versus
THE STATE OF JHARKHAND – Respondent


Advocates:
['MANOJ KUMAR SAH', '', 'KRISHNA KUMAR', 'AMARJEET PRASAD', 'PRABHU DAYAL AGRAWAL']

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI

A.B. A. No. 2051 of 2022

1. Geeta Devi @ Geta Davi

2. Birendra Prakash Sah @ Birendra Prasad Sah @ Berendar Prasad

Sha

3. Sanjhiya Devi @ Sanjiya Davi

4. Mostt. Sati Rani @ Mosmat Sita Rani

5. Hema Sah @ Hemant Kumar Sah @ Hema Sha

6. Savitri Devi @ Sabetri Davi

… Petitioners

Versus

The State of Jharkhand

Opposite Party

Coram: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY

For the Petitioner

: Mr. Manoj Kr. Sah ,Adv.

For the State

: Mr. P.D. Agrawal ,Spl. P.P.

02 / 22.03.2022

Heard the parties.

Apprehending their arrest, the petitionershave

moved this Court for grant of privilege of anticipatory bail in

connection with Godda (Muffasil) P.S. Case No. 269 of 2021

registered under Sections 341, 323, 452, 354B, 379, 504, 506, 34 of

the Indian Penal Code and Section 3/4 of Prevention of Witch

(Daain) Practices Act.

Learned counsel appearing for the petitioners

submits that the allegation against the petitioners is that the

petitioners in furtherance of their common intent

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top