SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

GERMINE LAKRA – Appellant
Versus
MICHEL BHUT KUMAR – Respondent


Advocates:
['KUNDAN KR AMBASTHA', '', 'SANDEEP VERMA', 'SUMIT KUMAR', 'KRISHNA SHANKAR', '', 'SURESH KUMAR']

1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI

W.P.(C) No.1291 of 2019

---------

Germine Lakra @ Germaine Lakra

………

Petitioner

Versus

1. Michel Bhut Kumar

2. Karlus Bhut Kumar

3. Deputy Commissioner, Ranchi

……….

Respondents

---------

CORAM

: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUJIT NARAYAN PRASAD

---------

For the Petitioner

: Mr. Kundan Kr. Ambastha, Advocate

For the Respondents

: Mrs. Shweta Singh, Advocate

---

05/13.05.2019

The writ petition is under Article 227 of the Constitution of

India, wherein order dated 17.12.2018 passed in Title Suit No.178 of

2014 by Munsif-XIV, Ranchi, is under challenge, whereby and

whereunder, the trial Court has appointed Survey Knowing Pleader

Commissioner to take measurement of the land in dispute in order to

decide the land dispute between both the parties.

2.

It is the case of the petitioner as per the pleading made in the

writ petition that the declaratory suit has been filed being Title Suit

No.178 of 2014 claiming therein the relief to declare the right, title and

interest over the suit property in favour of the

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top