SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND - PRINCIPAL BENCH JHARKHAND
MD FAHIM ALIAS FAHIM ANSARI – Appellant
Versus
THE STATE OF JHARKHAND – Respondent


Advocates:
['MD SHAHABUDDIN', '', 'QUMAR IMAM ANSARI', 'V N JHA']

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI

B.A. No. 5003 of 2021

------

Md. Fahim @ Fahim Ansari

...Petitioner(s).

Versus

The State of Jharkhand

… Opp. Party(s)

CORAM

:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANANDA SEN.

Through: Video Conferencing

------

For the Petitioner(s)

: Md. Shahabuddin, Advocate.

For the State

: A.P.P

06/16.09.2021:

Heard learned counsel for the parties.

The lawyers have no objection with regard to the proceeding, which has

been held through video conferencing today at 10.30 A.M. They have no

complaint in respect to the audio and video clarity and quality.

The petitioner is an accused for allegedly committing an offence punishable

under Sections 394, 302/34 of the IPC.

Petitioner has prayed for bail on the ground that he has remained in custody

for more than six months and two witnesses are yet to be examined. Petitioner

is an accused for committing an offence under Section 394, 302/34 of the Indian

Penal Code arising out of Doranda P.S. Case No. 32 of 1993. Petitioner was

absconding. In the meantime other co-accused person was put on tria

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top