SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

AMRENDRA KUMAR – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF JHARKHAND – Respondent


Advocates:
['RAJESH KUMAR', '', 'ROHITASHYA ROY ALIS ROHIT ROY', 'LAXMI MURMU', '', 'RAKESH KUMAR', 'JITENDRA PANDEY']

- 1 -

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI

Cr. Revision No. 495 of 2012

Amrendra Kumar, son of Gorak Nath Ganjhu ..... Petitioner

Versus

1. The State of Jharkhand.

2. Punita Devi, w/o Amrendra Kumar .…. Opposite Parties

--------

CORAM: HON’BLE MRS. JUSTICE ANUBHA RAWAT CHOUDHARY

--------

For the Petitioner

: Mr. Vibhor Mayank, Advocate

For the Opposite Party-State : Mr. Jitendra Pandey, A.P.P.

---------

Through Video Conferencing

---------

C.A.V. on 25.03.2021

Pronounced on 09.04.2021

1.

Heard Mr. Vibhor Mayank, learned counsel for the petitioner.

2.

Heard Mr. Jitendra Pandey, learned A.P.P. for the opposite party-

State.

3.

The present criminal revision has been filed, challenging the

legality, propriety and correctness of the Judgment dated 25.5.2012,

passed by the learned Principal Sessions Judge, Latehar, in Criminal

Appeal No. 8 of 2010, whereby, the learned Appellate Court has been

pleased to dismiss the appeal, preferred by the petitioner against the

Judgment of Conviction and Order of Sentence dated 20

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top