SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

Prashant Kumar Singh – Appellant
Versus
The State Of Jharkhand – Respondent


Advocates:
['DEEPAK KUMAR', '', 'SAHIL', 'SACHIN MAHATO', 'AMRITA KUMARI APP', '', 'SHEKHAR PRASAD SINHA']

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI

Cr.M.P. No. 2407 of 2016

Prashant Kumar Singh

... Petitioner(s).

-Versus-

The State of Jharkhand

… Opp. Part(s).

------

CORAM

:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANANDA SEN.

------

For the Petitioner(s) : Mr. Deepak Kumar, Advocate.

For the State

: A.P.P.

For Opp. Party No. 2 : Mr. Shekhar Pd. Sinha, Advocate.

…......

16/24.10.2019:

By way of filing this petition, the petitioner has prayed for quashing

the order dated 21.3.2016, by which, the learned Special Judge in Spl. (POCSO)

Case No. 53/2014, on the petition filed by the complainant/informant, has directed

to produce the victim for recording her statement under Section 164 Cr.P.C.

2.

The complaint was filed by the complainant/informant, who is the wife

of this petitioner, stating therein that this petitioner, being the father of the victim,

has molested her minor daughter. The complaint was sent under Section 156(3)

Cr.P.C for registering the FIR. Consequently, Katras P.S. Case No. 434 of 2014

was lodged under Section 498A IPC, Section 23 of the Juvenile Justice (Care and

Protection of Children) Act and Sections 4, 6 and 8 of the POCSO Act. The pol

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top