SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

KISHUNDEO RAI – Appellant
Versus
FOREST – Respondent


Advocates:
['DEEPAK KUMAR', '', 'SANJAY KR PANDEY', 'ABHAY KR MISHRA', '', 'SREENU GARAPATI', 'MANOJ KR NO', 'YOGENDRA PRASAD SC']

1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI

W.P.(Cr.) No. 21 of 2013

…..

Kishundeo Rai

….. Petitioner(s).

-V e r s u s-

1. The State of Jharkhand.

2. Divisional Forest Officer, Wild Life Division, Hazaribagh-cum-Authorised

Officer , (Section – 52 of Indian Forest Act), P.O., P.S. & District-

Hazaribagh.

3. Range Officer, Koderma Wild Life Forest Range, Koderma, P.O., P.S. &

District- Koderma.

….. Respondent (s).

…..

CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANANDA SEN

…..

For the Petitioner(s)

: Mr. Deepak Kumar, Advocate

For the State

: Mr. Navnit Prakash, A.C. to S.C.III

…..

Reserved On 22/10/2019

Pronounced On 01/09/2020

1.

In this writ application, the petitioner prayed for quashing the

entire proceeding of Confiscation Case No. 57 of 2012 pending before

Divisional

Forest

Officer-cum-Authorised

Officer,

Wild

Life

Division,

Hazaribagh, whereby and whereunder the respondent had issued a notice to

the petitioner to show cause as to why not the Tata 407 vehicle bearing

Registration No. BR-06G-6547 be confiscated. Further a p

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top