SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Article Pause Article
judgment-img

HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND
LAL KRISHNA KUMAR NATH SHAHDEO ALIAS L K K N SHAHDEO – Appellant
Versus
THE STATE OF JHARKHAND – Respondent
Cont.(Cvl) 418/2019



Advocates:
['AMRENDRA PRADHAN', '', 'PRAN PRANAY', 'SUNIL KUMAR', '', 'MITHILESH SINGH', 'ASHOK KR YADAV', 'KUMAR HARSH', 'SURYA PRAKASH']

AWARD

BEFORE NATIONAL LOK ADALAT DATED 13.08.2022

HELD AT JHARKHAND HIGH COURT, RANCHI

[Organized by High Court Legal Services Committee under Section 19,

Legal Services Authorities Act, 1987, (Central Act)]

BENCH NO. 2

COURT NO. 3

Case No.: Cont. Case (C). No. 418 of 2019

1. Petitioner/ Appellant:- Lal Krishna Kumar Nath Shahdeo @ L.K.K.N. Shahdeo

Versus

2. Respondent/O.P.(s).:- The State of Jharkhand & Ors.

Present:-

Name of Hon’ble Judge:- Hon’ble Mr. Justice Dr. S.N. Pathak

Name of Advocate Member:- Mr. Mithilesh Singh, GA-IV

AWARD

The dispute between the parties having been referred for determination to the

National Lok Adalat and the parties having compromised/ settled the case/ matter upto

the extent of Award, the following award is passed in term of settlement as per the order

enclosed herewith.

The parties are informed that the Court fee, if any, paid by any of them shall be

refunded.

………………………………..

………………………….

Petitioner/ Plaintiff/Appellant

Respondent/O.P.

………………………….

…………………………..

Sign. of Hon’ble Judge

Sign. of Advocate Member

(Seal of the Committee)

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI

(National Lok Adalat)

Cont. Case (C). No. 418 of 2019

----------

Lal Krishna Kumar Nath Shahdeo

@ L.K.K.N. Shahdeo

…

... Petitioner

-Versus-

The State of Jharkhand & Ors.

...

… Opp. Parties

----------

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE DR. S.N.PATHAK

MR. MITHILESH SINGH, GA-IV

For the Petitioner : Mr. Rupesh Singh, Advocate

For the Opp. Parties : Ms. Priyanka Boby, AC to Sr. SC-I

----------

13.08.2022

Today, this case is listed before the National Lok Adalat for adjudication of the

disputes between the parties.

It has been submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that the order of the

Court has already been complied with.

In view of fair submissions of the learned counsel for the petitioner, no

contempt is made out against the opposite parties and hence, it is dropped.

Accordingly, the matter is settled and the instant contempt petition stands

disposed of.

(Mithilesh Singh)

(Dr. S.N. Pathak, J.)

Sign. Advocate Member

Sign. of Hon’ble Judge

Kunal/

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top