Advocates:
['A K DAS', '', 'S P ROY', 'A P P', '', 'TRIPATI NATH VERMA']

1

Cr. Appeal (DB) No. 699 of 2002

With

Cr. Appeal (DB) No. 640 of 2002

Against the judgment of conviction and order of sentence dated

13th September 2002 and 17th September, 2002 respectively

passed by Sri Binay Kumar Sinha, Sessions Judge, Jamtara in

Sessions Case No. 278 of 1993/244 of 2001.

..........

Sushil Murmu

......

Appellant (In Cr. A. No. 699 of 2002)

1. Shiblal Murmu

2. Jadu Murmu

3. Aashu Murmu

......

Appellants (In Cr. A. No. 640 of 2002)

Versus

The State of Jharkhand

.....

Respondent (In both the appeals)

-------------

For the Appellant (s)

: Mr. Kaushik Sarkhel, Advocate

(In Cr. A. No. 699 of 2002),

Mr. Nagmani Tiwari, Advocate

(In Cr. A. No. 640 of 2002).

For the State

: Mr. T.N. Verma, APP.

.............

PRESENT

HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE D.N. PATEL

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SHREE CHANDRASHEKHAR

-------------

Dated 5th February, 2013

Per D.N. Patel,J.:

1. Both the appeals have been preferred by the appellants against the

judgment and order of conviction and sentence passed by learned

Sessions Judge, Jamtara in Sessions Case No. 278 of 1993/244 of 2001.

By this judgment and order of c