SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND - PRINCIPAL BENCH JHARKHAND
VIVEK ANAND SINGH – Appellant
Versus
THE STATE OF JHARKHAND – Respondent


Advocates:
['MOHIT PRAKASH', '', 'VANI KUMARI', 'SUNIL KUMAR DUBEY']

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI

A.B.A. No. 3618 of 2022

------

1. Vivek Anand Singh @ Vivekanand Singh @ Vivek Anand Singh

2. Bharat Bhushan Pandey

....

....

….

Petitioners

Versus

The State of Jharkhand

....

....

....

Opposite Party

CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE GAUTAM KUMAR CHOUDHARY

For the Petitioners

: Mr. Mohit Prakash, Advocate

Ms. Vani Kumari, Advocate

For the State

: Mr. Sunil Kumar Dubey, A.P.P.

Oral Order

05/ Dated :04.07.2022

The anticipatory bail application filed on behalf of petitioners, who are

apprehending their arrest in connection with Sadar P.S. Case No.130 of 2021 for the

offence registered under Sections 147, 149, 353, 188, 307, 427, 269, 270 of the

Indian Penal Code, Section 3 of the Jharkhand State Epidemic Disease (Covid 19)

Regulation and Section 51 of Disaster Management Act pending in the Court of

learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Hazaribagh is pressed into motion.

It is submitted by the learned counsel that the petitioners are innocent and

there is nothing on record to sug

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top