SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

SONU KUMAR MISHRA ALIAS DENGU ALIAS SONU KUMAR MISHRA – Appellant
Versus
THE STATE OF JHARKHAND – Respondent


Advocates:
['ANURAG KASHYAP', '', 'SUPRIYA DAYAL', 'SURAJ KISHORE PRASAD', 'BHOLA NATH OJHA']

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI

B.A. No. 6320 of 2021

------

Sonu Kumar Mishra @ Dengu @ Sonu Kumar Mishra

...Petitioner(s).

Versus

The State of Jharkhand

… Opp. Party(s)

CORAM

:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANANDA SEN.

Through: Video Conferencing

------

For the Petitioner(s)

: Mr. Anurag Kashyap, Advocate.

For the State

: A.P.P

02/24.07.2021:

Defects as pointed out by the office is ignored.

Heard learned counsel for the parties. The lawyers have no objection with

regard to the proceeding, which has been held through video conferencing today

at 11.00 A.M. They have no complaint in respect to the audio and video clarity and

quality.

The petitioner is an accused for allegedly committing an offence punishable

under Sections 395 of the IPC.

Petitioner is not named in the F.I.R. It is alleged that the dacoity has taken place

in the factory premises and several materials were looted away. Vehicle was

intercepted carrying the loaded materials. Petitioner was arrested and they

confessed their guilt. On the aforesaid ground, petitioner has been made as

accused.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top