SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

LALU YADAV ALIAS SANJIT YADAV ALIAS SANJIT – Appellant
Versus
THE STATE OF JHARKHAND – Respondent


Advocates:
['JITENDRA SHANKAR SINGH', '', 'PINKI KUMARI', 'RANDHIR KUMAR', 'BHOLA NATH OJHA']

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI

B. A. No. 6455 of 2021

....

Lalu Yadav @ Sanjit Yadav @ Sanjit

.…

Petitioner

Versus

The State of Jharkhand

.... Opposite Party

....

CORAM:

HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH KUMAR

For the Petitioner

: Mr. J.S.Singh, Adv.

For the State

: Mr. B.N.Ojha, APP

....

The matter was taken up through Video Conferencing. Learned counsels for the parties

had no objection with it and submitted that the audio and video qualities are good.

....

02/24.07.2021

Defect as pointed out by the office is, hereby, ignored for the time being.

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP.

The present application has been filed for grant of regular bail to the

petitioner in connection with Chhipadohar P.S. Case No.24 of 2020, registered

under Section 392 of the Indian Penal Code.

Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that the petitioner is in

custody since 10.01.2021. It has been further submitted that the investigation has

already been completed and he is ready to co-operate in the trial. It has been further

submitted that the nam

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top