SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND - PRINCIPAL BENCH JHARKHAND
AMBIKA TIWARY – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF JHARKHAND And ORS – Respondent


Advocates:
['DILIP KUMAR JAISWAL', 'SR S C II', '', 'VANDANA SINGH']

1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI

W.P.(S) No. 1609 of 2011

Ambika Tiwary

.. Petitioner

Versus

1. The State of Jharkhand

2. Chief Engineer, Water Resources Department,

Ranchi, P.O. & P.S-Dhurwa, Dist-Ranchi

3. Executive Engineer (Mechanical Division), Banaso,

P.O Banaso, P.S. and District-Hazaribagh ..... Respondents

------

CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE DEEPAK ROSHAN

-----

For the Petitioner

: Mr. Gautam Kumar, Advocate

For the Respondents : Ms. Vandana Singh, Sr. SC-III

-----

03/ 28.07.2021

Heard through V.C.

2.

The instant writ application has been preferred by the

petitioner praying for a direction upon the respondent authorities to

give difference of promotional benefits to this petitioner which is

due since long.

3.

Mr. Gautam Kumar, learned counsel for the petitioner

fairly submits that since he has no contact with his client as such

the instant writ application may be disposed of with a liberty to the

petitioner that if his grievance has not yet been redressed then he

may be at liberty to file a fresh representation.

4.

Ms. Vandana Singh, learned counsel for t

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top