SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

PUNAM KUJUR ALIAS PUNAM DEVI – Appellant
Versus
THE STATE OF JHARKHAND THROUGH THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER – Respondent


Advocates:
['RAJESH KUMAR', 'RAJIV RANJAN', '', 'SUMEET GADODIA']

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI

W.P.(C) No.2009 of 2022

-----

Punam Kujur @ Punam Devi

.......... Petitioner.

-Versus-

1. The State of Jharkhand through the Deputy Commissioner,

Lohardaga.

2. The State Election Commission through its Chief Election Officer,

Near Gayatri Mandir, Old OPD, HEC Colony, Sector-2, Dhurwa,

Ranchi.

3. The Secretary, State Election Commission, Near Gayatri Mandir,

Old OPD, HEC Colony, Sector-2, Dhurwa, Ranchi.

4. The Sub Divisional Officer, Lohardaga.

5. The Returning Officer, Kisko Block, Kisko, District Lohardaga.

6. The Circle Officer, Kisko, District Lohardaga.

.......... Respondents.

-----

CORAM : HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH SHANKAR

-----

For the Petitioner

:

Mr. Rajesh Kumar, Advocate

For the State

:

Mr. Mohan Kumar Dubey, A.C. to A.G.

For the Res. Nos.2 & 3:

Mr. Ritesh Kumar Gupta, A.C. to

Mr. Sumeet Gadodia, Advocate

-----

Order No.02

Date: 05.05.2022

Mr. Rajesh Kumar, learned counsel for the petitioner, is

permitted to make necessary correction in the designation of the

respondent no.5 in course of the day.

The present writ petition has been filed for quash

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top