SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

VISHAL PRATAP SINGH – Appellant
Versus
THE STATE OF JHARKHAND – Respondent


Advocates:
['INDRAJIT SINHA', '', 'AWINASH KUMAR', 'ANKIT VISHAL', 'AJAY KUMAR SAH', 'SANJAY KUMAR SRIVASTAVA', '', 'ANURAG KASHYAP', 'SUPRIYA DAYAL']

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI

A.B.A. No.3506 of 2020

------

Vishal Pratap Singh

....

....

….

Petitioner

Versus

The State of Jharkhand

....

....

.... Opposite Party

------

CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY

------

For the Petitioner

: Mr. Indrajit Sinha, Advocate

For the State

: Mr. Sanjay Kr. Srivastava, Addl.P.P

For the Informant

: Mr. A. K. Kashyap, Sr. Advocate

------

Order No.03 Dated- 05.08.2021

Heard the parties through video conferencing.

Apprehending his arrest in connection with Telco P.S. Case No.78 of

2020 instituted under Sections 376 of the Indian Penal Code, the petitioner

has moved this Court for grant of privileges of anticipatory bail.

Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that the

allegation against the petitioner is that the petitioner established physical

relationship with the informant/victim girl on the false pretext of marriage

and now threatening her. It is submitted that the allegation against the

petitioner is false. It is next submitted that admittedly the victim is a majo

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top