SANJAY YADAV – Appellant
Versus
THE STATE OF JHARKHAND – Respondent
A.B.A. 3998/2022
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI
(Criminal Miscellaneous Jurisdiction)
A.B.A. No. 3998 of 2022
-----
Sanjay Yadav
…… Petitioner
Versus
The State of Jharkhand
……Opposite Party
-----
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE KAILASH PRASAD DEO
-----
For the Petitioner
: Mr. Randhir Kumar, Advocate
Mrs. Pinki Kumari, Advocate
For the State
: Mrs. Nehala Sharmin, APP
-----
02/Dated: 23/05/2022
Heard, learned counsel for the petitioner, Mr. Randhir Kumar assisted by
learned counsel, Mrs. Pinki Kumari and learned counsel for the State, Mrs.
Nehala Sharmin, APP.
Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that petitioner is
apprehending his arrest in connection with Balumath P.S. Case No.16 of 2022,
for the offence registered under Sections 379, 414 IPC, Section 30(ii) of Coal
Mines Act, Section 21 of Mines and Minerals (Development & Regulation)
Act, Section 13 of Jharkhand Minerals (Prevention oif Illegal Mining,
Transportation and Storage) Rules, 2017.
Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that petitioner is the driver
of one of the seized truck bearing registration No.JH-19C-8665, which was
found with 23 tones of coal.
Learned counsel for the petitioner has further submitted that owner of the
truck has already been granted anticipatory bail by co-ordinate Bench of this
Court on deposit of Rs.70,000/- vide order dated 24.03.2022 passed in A.B.A.
No.2087/2022, as such, petitioner who is driver and he was not involved in
loading the coal as he was not apprehended at the spot and petitioner has no
criminal antecedent, as such, petitioner may be enlarged on anticipatory bail.
Learned counsel for the State, Mrs. Nehala Sharmin, APP has opposed
the prayer for bail and has submitted that owner has been granted bail on
deposit Rs.70,000/-, as such, petitioner may also deposit the sum amount.
Be that as it may this Court has grant to anticipatory bail or reject
anticipatory bail this Court has no jurisdiction to pass any order for deposit the
amount , since the owner of the vehicle has already been granted anticipatory
bail and petitioner is driver was not found in this case, accordingly, petitioner
(Sanjay Yadav) is directed to surrender before the court below within four
-2-
weeks from the date of this order and in the event of his arrest or surrender, the
court below shall enlarge the above named petitioner on bail on furnishing bail
bond of Rs. 20,000/- (Rupees Twenty Thousand) with two sureties of the like
amount each to the satisfaction of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Latehar in
connection with Balumath P.S. Case No.16 of 2022 subject to the conditions, as
laid down under Section 438(2) Cr.P.C and also on the following conditions:-
(i) One of the bailors shall be deponent/pairvikar of the present case namely,
Ravi Turi, S/o Sukra Turi, R/o Village- Kali Dumaro, P.O.- Nindra, P.S.
Chandwa, District- Letehar, who has furnished photocopy of his UID Card
before this Court in the bail application.
Office is directed to send photo copy of the UID Card of deponent along
with this order to the court below so as to verify the authenticity of the bailor.
(ii) Another bailor shall be father/mother/son/sister/brother/wife.
Accordingly, the instant anticipatory bail application is hereby allowed.
(Kailash Prasad Deo, J.)
R.S.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.