SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND - PRINCIPAL BENCH JHARKHAND
Baiju Soren – Appellant
Versus
The State Of Jharkhand – Respondent


IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI

B.A. No. 11368 of 2013

1. Lodo Hansda

2. Baris Murmu

3. Khayale Tudu @ Khayle Tudu

4. Fathar Murmu

5. Fichana Kisku @ Bodam Kisku

6. Tuku @ Tukar Hembrom

7. Bajal Marandi

8. Mukam Hansda

9. Ram Soren

10. Baiju Soren

11. Barse Tudu

12. Chunku Tudu

13. Thakur Murmu

...

Petitioners

-V e r s u s-

The State of Jharkhand

… Opposite Party

...

CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE PRASHANT KUMAR.

For the Petitioners : Mr. Gautam Kumar, Advocate

For the State

: Mr. S. Mahto, A.P.P.

02/11.02.2014

Bail application filed by Lodo Hansda, Baris Murmu,

Khayale Tudu @ Khayle Tudu, Fathar Murmu, Fichana

Kisku @ Bodam Kisku, Tuku @ Tukar Hembrom, Bajal

Marandi, Mukam Hansda, Ram Soren, Baiju Soren, Barse

Tudu, Chunku Tudu and Thakur Murmu, is moved by Sri

Gautam Kumar, learned counsel for the petitioners and

opposed by Sri S. Mahto, learned Additional P.P. for the

State.

In the first information report, informant took the

name of petitioner nos. 1, 4, 5 & 6 among the culprit.

However, in the subsequent statement, he took the name of

only petitioner no. 1. Other petitioners are not named

either in

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top