SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

SUKHDEO ORAON AND ORS – Appellant
Versus
BANTI ORAIN AND ORS – Respondent


IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI

S.A. No. 474 of 2015

1. Sukhdeo Oraon

2. Baldeo Oraon

3. Jagdeo Oraon

4. Sanicharwa Oraon

5. Suraj Oeraon

6. Jhuran Orao

7. Dasai Oraon..….......

Appellants

Versus

1. Banti Orain

2. Bandhini Orain

3. Deputy Commissioner, Gumla

4. Chanda Oraon

5. Ladman Oraon

6. Deputy Commissioner, Gumla…………

Respondents

……

Coram: Hon’ble Mr. Justice Ananda Sen

……

For the Appellants

: Mr. Arun Kumar, Advocate

For the Respondents

: ----

……

6/25.11.2021

This appeal is directed against the judgment and decree dated

26.05.2015, passed in Title Appeal No. 35 of 2006, by the Principal

District Judge, Gumla, whereby the appellate court affirmed the judgment

and decree dated 25.05.2006, passed in Title Suit No. 29 of 1994 by the

Sub-Judge-I, Gumla.

2.

Challenging the concurrent finding, the appellants-plaintiffs have

filed this appeal.

3.

I have heard learned counsel for the appellants. Counsel for the

appellants raised only ground that as per the Tribal Custom the daughters

cannot inherit the property in question, thus, the permission accorded by

the Authority t

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top