SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND - PRINCIPAL BENCH JHARKHAND
NITIN KUMAR MISHRA – Appellant
Versus
THE STATE OF JHARKHAND THROUGH THE SECRETARY PR SECRETARY HOME DEPARTMENT – Respondent
LPA 186/2021



Advocates:
['MANOJ TANDON', '', 'NEHA BHARDWAJ', 'SNEHA KUMARI', 'PARTH S A SWAROOP PATI', '', 'TEJO MISTRY', 'SANJAY PIPRAWALL', 'PRINCE KUMAR', 'ADVOCATE GENERAL']

1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI

L.P.A. No. 186 of 2021

with

I.A. No. 3097 of 2021

------

1.Nitin Kumar Mishra, son of Vinay Kumar Mishra, C/o

Hare Krishna Pandey, resident of back side of Hanuman

Mandir, Jodhardih More, P.O. & P.S. Chas, District

Bokaro.

2.Ravindra Kumar Singh, son of Siyaram Singh, residing

at Quarter No. WCB 6/6, Paschhipalli, P.O. & P.S.

Chandrapura, District Bokaro.

3.Manoj Kumar Mahto, son of Palturam Mahto, resident

of Village Dumra (Sahu Basti), P.O.Nawagarh, P.S.

Baghmara, District Dhanbad.

4.Uttam Kumar Mahto, son of Bhuneshwar Prasad

Mahto, resident of Village Harina Basti, P.O. Nawagarh,

P.S. Barora, District Dhanbad

5.Sumit Kumar Mahto, son of Ram Lakhan Mahto,

resident of Village Talbanna, P.O. Sahibganj, P.S.

Sahibganj, District Sahibganj

6.Mochi Ram Mahto, son of Akal Mahto, resident of

Bahiyardih, P.O.Bahiyardih, P.S. & District Dhanbad

7.Uchit Kumar Ghosh, son of Jaharlal Ghosh, resident

of Village & P.O. Patharia, P.S. Kotalphokhar, District

Sahibganj

8.Sujan Kumar Roy, son of Kartick Roy, resident of

Village & P.O. Barindabon, P.S. Taljhari, District

Sahibganj

9.Shiv Kumar, son of Sunil Kumar Laheri, resident of

Village Rasulpur Dahala, P.O. & P.S. Sahibganj, District

Sahibganj

2

10.Rajesh Kumar, son of Prayag Prasad Laheri, resident

of Rasulpur, Dahala, P.O. & P.S. Sahibganj, District

Sahibganj

...... Writ Petitioners/Appellants

Versus

1.The

State

of

Jharkhand

through

the

Secretary/Principal

Secretary,

Home

Department,

having office at Project Building, Dhurwa, P.O & P.S.

Dhurwa, Town and District Ranchi.

2.Jharkhand Staff Selection Commission through its

Secretary, having office at Kalinagar, Chaibagan,

Namkom, P.O. & P.S. Namkom, Town and District-

Ranchi.

3.The Controller of Examinations, Jharkhand Staff

Selection Commission, having office at Kalinagar,

Chaibagan, Namkom, P.O. & P.S. Namkom, Town and

District- Ranchi.

....

Respondents/Respondents

4.Ravi Shankar Kumar, son of Raj Kishor Ram, resident

of Mohalla Ambedkar Nagar, Tanki Side, Dhurwa, P.O. &

P.S. Dhurwa, District Ranchi

5.Tinku Kumar Rawani, son of Madan Mohan Rawani,

resident of Village Harina, P.O. Nawagarh, P.S. Barora,

District Dhanbad

6.Prem Ranjan Kumar, son of Sanjay Kumar Karjee,

resident at Quarter No.276, Zero 8FAM, Tetulmari, P.O.

Sijua, P.S. Tetulmari, District Dhanbad

7. Sandeep Rajwar, son of Heera Lal Rajwar, resident of

Village Bhuchungdih, P.O. Jaina More, P.S. Jaridih,

Distrct Bokaro

8.Niraj Kumar Yadav, son of Hargovind Yadav, resident

of Village & P.O. Kushmaha, P.S.Madhupur, District

Deoghar

9.Ratnesh Kumar, son of Endrdev Prasad Yadav,

resident of Village Rajawar, P.O. Jogidih, District

Koderma. .... Petitioners/Performa Respondents

3

-------

CORAM: HON’BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE

HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SUJIT NARAYAN PRASAD

-------

For the Appellants : Mr. Manoj Tandon, Advocate

For the Res-State

: Mr. P.A.S. Pati, G.A. II

For the Res Nos. 2 & 3: Mr. (Dr.). Ashok Kumar Singh,

Mr. Akash Deep, Advocates.

-------

Oral Judgment

Order No. 04: Dated 9th December, 2021:

I.A. No. 3097 of 2021

This Interlocutory Application has been filed under

Section 5 of the Limitation Act for condonation of delay

in filing the appeal.

2.

Perused the office note.

3.

Office has reported that the appeal is not barred

by limitation in view of the order passed by Hon’ble

Supreme Court in Misc. Application No. 665 of 2021 and

as such, Mr. Manoj Tandon, learned counsel for the

appellants do not want to press the Interlocutory

Application as the appeal has been preferred within

time.

4.

In

view

thereof,

the

instant

Interlocutory

Application is permitted to be withdrawn.

L.P.A. No. 186 of 2021

5.

The instant intra-court appeal

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top