SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND - PRINCIPAL BENCH JHARKHAND
SNEHASHIS SARKAR – Appellant
Versus
THE STATE OF JHARKHAND – Respondent


Advocates:
['MUKESH KR BANKA', '', 'ALPANA KUMARI', 'PRABHU DAYAL AGRAWAL']

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI

A.B.A. No. 4662 of 2021

------

Snehashis Sarkar … Petitioner

Versus

The State of Jharkhand

Opposite Party

------

CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY

------

For the Petitioner

: Mr. R.S. Mazumdar, Sr. Advocate

: Mr. Mukesh Kr. Banka, Advocate

For the State

: Mr. P.D. Agrawal, Spl. P.P.

------

Order No.02 Dated- 28.07.2021

Heard the parties through video conferencing.

Learned Senior Advocate appearing for the petitioner

personally undertakes to remove the defects as pointed out by the

stamp reporter within two weeks after the lockdown period is over.

In view of the personal undertaking of the learned Senior

Advocate appearing for the petitioner, the defects pointed out by the

stamp reporter are ignored for the present.

Apprehending his arrest, the petitioner has moved this Court

for grant of privilege of anticipatory bail in connection with Drugs &

Cosmetics Case No.01 of 2020 registered under sections 27 (b) (ii)

and 27 (d) of Drugs & Cosmetics Act, 1940.

The

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top