ABRAR AHMAD ALIAS PINTU – Appellant
Versus
THE STATE OF JHARKHAND – Respondent
B.A. 8152/2021
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI
B.A. No. 8152 of 2021
------
Abrar Ahmad @ Pintu … Petitioner
Versus
The State of Jharkhand … Opposite Party
------
CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY
------
For the Petitioner
: None
For the State
: None
------
Order No.02 Dated- 30.07.2021
The matter is taken up through video conferencing.
No one turns up on behalf of the parties.
The petitioner is directed to remove the defects as pointed out
by the stamp reporter within two weeks after the lockdown period
is over.
The petitioner has moved this Court for grant of bail in
connection with Sessions Trial No.49 of 2020 arising out of Bokaro
Thermal P.S. Case No.51 of 2019 (G.R. No.383 of 2019) registered
under sections 302/323/34 of the Indian Penal Code.
Perusal of the record reveals that earlier the prayer for regular
bail of the petitioner was rejected by this Court vide order dated
14.12.2020 in B.A. No.9678 of 2020 and by the said order, the trial
court was directed to conclude the trial within six months from the
date of receipt of the said rejection order by the trial court.
Perusal of the record further reveals that it has been averred in
the bail application that the charge sheet witness have been examined
and the petitioner has annexed the copy of the depositions of the
witnesses as Annexure-3 series wherein the father of the deceased has
been examined as P.W.1 who has been declared hostile as he did not
support the case of the prosecution and the eye-witness and injured
in the occurrence being the P.W.2-Md. Tufail Ahmad has also not
supported the case of the prosecution and has been declared hostile.
P.W.3- Manish @ Ravindra Yadav and P.W.4- Suresh Kumar Yadav
have also not supported the case of the prosecution and have been
declared hostile. It is next averred in the bail application that the
petitioner has been in custody since 24.04.2019 and the petitioner is
ready to abide by any terms and condition as imposed upon him by
this Court.
Considering the aforesaid facts, I am inclined to enlarge the
above named petitioner on bail. Accordingly, the petitioner is
directed to be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 25,000/-
(Rupees Twenty Five Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount
each to the satisfaction of learned A.S.J.-IV, Bermo at Tenughat, in
connection with Sessions Trial No.49 of 2020 arising out of Bokaro
Thermal P.S. Case No.51 of 2019 (G.R. No.383 of 2019).
(Anil Kumar Choudhary, J.)
Sonu-Gunjan/
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.